Net Zero Compare

Google Deal Makes Amazon Reforestation Its Top Source of Carbon Removal Credits

Maílis Carrilho
Maílis Carrilho
Updated on November 13th, 2025
Google Deal Makes Amazon Reforestation Its Top Source of Carbon Removal Credits
4 min read
Updated November 13th, 2025
Our principle

Cut through the green tape

We don't push agendas. At Net Zero Compare, we cut through the hype and fear to deliver the straightforward facts you need for making informed decisions on green products and services. Whether motivated by compliance, customer demands, or a real passion for the environment, you’re welcome here. We provide reliable information. Why you seek it is not our concern.

Google has signed a new large-scale carbon-removal agreement with Brazilian startup Mombak, marking its biggest investment in nature-based offsets and placing the company among the most active corporate buyers of high-quality forest-removal credits. The deal covers 200,000 metric tons of carbon-removal credits generated through Amazon forest restoration, expanding a smaller pilot agreement that the two companies established in 2024.

The transaction reflects a broader shift inside the technology sector. As data centres and artificial-intelligence systems drive up electricity use, major technology firms are increasingly turning to verified, high-integrity carbon-removal solutions to address residual emissions. Google’s own market-based electricity emissions have more than tripled since 2020, reinforcing the need for removals that are both credible and aligned with long-term climate commitments.

High-Integrity Removals Over Low-Cost Offsets

A key feature of the agreement is Google’s focus on removal-based forest projects rather than traditional avoidance-based credits. The company has publicly emphasised that it will not purchase avoided-deforestation credits from the voluntary market due to longstanding concerns around overstated baselines, weak monitoring, risks of leakage and allegations of fraudulent activity in some rainforest regions.

In contrast, Mombak’s model centres on restoring degraded pasturelands in the Amazon by planting diverse native species and tracking carbon sequestration as the forest regenerates. These projects directly remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, creating a more measurable and durable climate benefit and better aligning with emerging standards for corporate net-zero strategies.

Rising Prices for Premium Forest Credits

As scrutiny of carbon-credit quality intensifies, companies are paying far more for projects that demonstrate additionality, permanence and demonstrable ecological value. In Brazil, high-integrity reforestation credits often sell for more than five times the price of generic avoidance credits. Some transactions in the country’s premium segment now exceed one hundred dollars per ton.

The shortage of credible supply is a central driver of this price escalation. Mombak’s projects have been among the few to meet the rigorous review criteria used by major corporate coalitions focused on nature-based removals. Its selection by high-profile technology buyers signals that forest-restoration credits are moving from a niche category to a mainstream component of long-term climate portfolios.

Brazil’s Growing Role Ahead of COP30

The deal also comes at a strategically important moment for Brazil. The country will host the next major UN climate summit, where forest conservation and restoration are expected to be central themes. As the world’s largest tropical-forest nation, Brazil is positioning itself as a global supplier of nature-based carbon removals while aiming to rebuild its leadership in climate diplomacy.

Large corporate purchases can help accelerate restoration efforts, direct capital toward degraded lands and support new rural economic models centred on long-term ecosystem recovery. However, they also raise essential governance questions. Brazil must ensure land-rights integrity, protect biodiversity, avoid monoculture planting and deliver social benefits to local and Indigenous communities.

Implications for the Voluntary-Carbon Market

Google’s agreement is notable not only for its size but also for the signal it sends to the voluntary-carbon market. Many major technology firms are now emphasising a preference for carbon removals rather than emissions-avoidance credits. That shift is expected to deepen as science-based target frameworks place stronger conditions on what counts as credible mitigation.

For project developers, this means financial incentives are moving toward long-term carbon durability, ecological restoration and socio-environmental safeguards. For corporate buyers, it indicates that future portfolios will likely consist of fewer but more expensive credits, integrated with other long-term mitigation strategies such as clean-energy procurement and engineered removals.

Toward a Higher-Standard Market

As demand continues to outpace supply, high-quality forest-restoration credits are becoming a benchmark for the next generation of voluntary-carbon markets. The Google-Mombak agreement illustrates what many analysts describe as a “flight to quality,” where buyers accept higher costs in exchange for stronger scientific integrity, greater transparency and measurable climate impact.

If more companies adopt similar standards, it could accelerate the shift away from low-cost, low-integrity offsets and reshape the market around projects that deliver verifiable environmental and social outcomes. At the same time, developers will face increasing pressure to scale up operations while maintaining ecological authenticity and long-term monitoring commitments.

Google’s investment in Amazon reforestation signals both corporate demand for reliable carbon removals and Brazil’s central role in supplying them. As the voluntary-carbon market evolves, deals of this nature may set the benchmark for integrity, transparency and long-term climate value.

Source: www.reuters.com


Maílis Carrilho
Written by:
Maílis Carrilho
Sustainability Research Analyst
Maílis Carrilho is a Sustainability Research Analyst (Intern) at Net Zero Compare, contributing research and analysis on climate tech, carbon policies, and sustainable solutions. She supports the team in developing fact-based content and insights to help companies and readers navigate the evolving sustainability landscape.

Mentioned in this article...